Skip Navigation
 

Join Your Company Pension Scheme Today

Cliff D'Arcy

By

Cliff D'Arcy

From the Fool blog

Local Police Station Is Useless!

Published in Retirement & Pensions on 26 September 2008

According to the latest figures, membership of work-based pension plans is dropping. Alas, some workers are turning down free money...

The number of employees in work-based pension plans continues to fall, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS). The latest Occupational Pension Schemes Annual Report from ONS revealed the following drop in membership from 2006 to 2007:

Number of

members (million)

2007

2006

Change

Employees

8.8

9.2

-0.4

Preserved pensions

9.4

9.4

-

Pensions being paid

8.5

8.2

+0.3

Total

26.7

26.8

-0.1

As you can see, the total membership of occupational pension schemes is broadly unchanged. However, the number of employee members dropped by 400,000 between 2006 and 2007. Over the same period, the number of pensions being paid out increased by 300,000.

The relentless decline of private-sector pensions

What’s particularly noticeable is that membership of defined-benefit (alias ‘final-salary’) schemes continues to decline, thanks to private-sector schemes being closed. Between 2006 and 2007, private-sector membership of defined-benefit schemes fell by a tenth (10%), from 3 million to 2.7 million. However, in the public sector, where pensions are provided and guaranteed by the government, membership of defined-benefit schemes actually rose slightly, to 5.2 million.

Defined-benefit schemes are seen as the ‘gold standard’ of occupational pensions. The pension a member receives is based on his/her length of service and earnings, usually at the point of retirement. Although a few defined-benefit schemes have collapsed in recent years, they are still viewed as ‘guaranteed’ pension plans.

On the other hand, members of a defined-contribution scheme (also known as a money-purchase scheme) enjoy no such guarantees. Their pensions depend on contribution levels, investment returns and the annuity rates in force when they convert their investment funds into income.

Of course, defined-benefit schemes cost employers a lot more to run, largely because of the high price of providing guaranteed pensions. Therefore, as you can see from the table below, contribution rates to defined-benefit schemes are far higher:

Average contribution rates to private-sector pensions in 2007

Contribution rates

(% of salary)

Defined-benefit

Schemes

Defined-contribution

schemes

Employers

15.6

6.5

Members

4.9

2.7

Total

20.5

9.2

Given the high cost of providing defined-benefit schemes, it’s no wonder that thousands have been closed to new (and even existing) members, particularly in the last ten years. So, if your employer provides you with a final-salary pension scheme, then you should count yourself lucky, as this benefit is usually worth more than a fifth (20%) of your before-tax salary!

Are you turning down free money?

In 2007, there were 29,000 occupational pension schemes still open to new members, not including group stakeholder schemes. The law requires employers with five or more employees to provide their workers with some form of pension scheme, with the minimum being a basic stakeholder pension. At present, employers are not obliged to contribute to these schemes, but this is set to change with the introduction of Personal Accounts in 2012.

In the meantime, if you are free to join your employer’s pension scheme, but have yet to do so, then you may be turning down ‘free’ money. For example, a monthly contribution of 5% of your wage could cost just 3% to 4% after taking tax relief into account. What’s more, by joining the scheme, you may receive contributions for your employer, which will boost your pot yet further, plus life insurance and other benefits.

For example, take the young graduate I met recently who had just started his first full-time job. He asked me whether it would be worthwhile contributing to his employer’s defined-contribution pension scheme. On discovering that his 5% contribution would be matched by 10% from his employer, I urged him to join without delay. After all, what other investment would triple his money on day one?

In summary, if you want to improve your future financial security, then look into joining your occupational pension scheme. It could be the best financial decision that you ever make!

More: Learn more about retirement and pensions | Save Your Retirement Savings | Get 12% More From Your Pension

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

davealucas 28 Sep 2008, 9:18am

Private sector organisations should re-open the defined benefit schemes to encourage more employees to join the "pot". The reason for the drop are closures anyway. People want security and defined benefit assures the payers much more than defined contribution pensions.

scottishchopper 28 Sep 2008, 10:28am

I certainly highly recommend joing a company scheme if one is available.

one question if i may. Where are we, the UK, in regards to european legislation particularly in regard to safeguarding of company pension pots following Maxwell's raidinhg of the Mirror Group pot et al. I had a discussion with a colleague recently and he believed that UK have not signed up to legislation that regards your personal 'pot' as part of your pay and therefore protected from management use or from raiding by a new owner post a buyout/takeover etc?

Any thoughts?

Vix100 28 Sep 2008, 11:03am

I agree, it would encourage more employees to join if the private sector re-opened their defined benefit schemes. However, I can understand why they've been closed - and can't honestly see that changing.

People may want these type of schemes - but who pays for them? I contribute 6% to my final salary pension, and my employer pays in 23.8% - but only 6% to the defined contributions scheme. They've also had to pay in large cash sums (£8m in 2003/4) to (narrowly) avoid a deficit (hence it was closed to new employees in 2004).

If companies can't afford these sort of payments (even with tax benefits) what happens to the scheme with more money going out than being paid in? Similarly, if they continue to inject this sort of cash and can't really afford it, what happens to the company and their pensioners?

With the exception of the public sector, these schemes are a dying breed I'm afraid.

DIYfixer 28 Sep 2008, 4:06pm

Could the other reasons for the decline be.

The average man in the street does not understand all the financial techno language that surrounds the average pension plan.

The average man in the street would not trust a financial advisor as far as they could throw one.

The average man in the street will not trust the volatile nature of shares, and the fact that those in the know use short/insider trading amongst other methods to manipulate the market, whilst the little guys get hung out to rot.

The average man in the street knows goverments have the ability to raid the pension funds as they see fit.

The average man in the street's inability to pull their money out of a pension plan that is faltering.

The average man in the street knows he will not stay with any one employer for more than a few years of his carrier, resulting in a miriad of small frozen company pensions.

The average man in the street knows employers are unwilling to fund a pension that is not their company run pension, compounding the above probem.

The average man in the street knows he faces high fund charges regardless of how well the fund is performing.

The only people to get rich from pensions are the fund managers and the financial institutions, it's certainley not the pensioners and now the credit crunch is really hitting hard, how will pensions perform now?

DP130132 28 Sep 2008, 5:15pm

My Pension/Annuity (Equitable) should be
paying me 2000 sterling a month.It is now about 270 sterling a month!!!.

"Non professional advice" - Take care,
do not put your money where you have
no control.

MikeGG1 28 Sep 2008, 8:00pm

In reply to Scottishchopper, the UK situation is very different from most of the rest of Europe, apart from the Dutch and to a lesser extent the Germans.

We have always had our pensions in trust funds which have always been completely separate from company accounts. Europe, generally, had book entries in their company accounts, so their pensions were an integral part of company assets.

The Maxwell problem was that he "persuaded" trustees to release assets to the company. These days 40% of Trustees are member-nominated and Unions take close watch on what is happening.

swimmingjohn 28 Sep 2008, 9:18pm

Final salary schemes started sliding downhill when two things happened:
1) our current (sub) Prime Minister raided the funds which paid for them, when appointed Chancellor, and
2) it was realised that we were all living longer.

Great idea; no longer affordable - like lots of things under this Government.

If you aren't in one, stop saving. Do like the Government - Spend it. Better still, borrow some and spend that too.
The Government will bail you out, and the bank daft enough to lend it to you.
Any savings you have, they will means-test out of you to make sure you are no better off than all the rest, and will have to vote for them to keep their gravy train rolling.

MrTaurus 28 Sep 2008, 10:31pm

swimmingjohn needs to checkout what he can expect from a state pension plus means tested benefits. If he is happy with the standard of living that implies (ask a few 75 year old state pensioners if you are not sure) that's fine. For the rest of us (who have not worked for the state all our lives and have a taxpayer backed inflation proofed final salary pension) and want a higher standard of living in retirement there is no sensible alternative to starting a pension fund as early as possible. Older workers who fear their fund may be insufficient should know that they can now contribute, and get tax relief on, 100% of earnings. worth considering if you've got substantial savings earning at best 6-7% (taxable). OK so you may never live to collect it all, but when you're food for worms who cares? And most pensions will allow you to take a tax free lump sum as soon as you start to draw the pension. Get real!!

Ilovedoggies 29 Sep 2008, 10:35am

There is no point at all paying into a pension. You can't get access to the money if you need to, unlike an ISA. With interest rates so high on mortgages, that 6% extra in take home pay if you don't pay into pension, may be the difference between staying in your home or losing it. Most people can hardly make ends meet today, let alone tomorrow.

fenemore 29 Sep 2008, 12:09pm

Re: swimmingjohn

Although MrTaurus is right, I thing swimmingjohn was just trying to point out how futile it is to save when those savings can be "confiscated" by the state to pay for what would otherwise be free.

One point to make regarding the tax-free lump sum on retirement. Unless you are of general poor health or have a terminal diagnosis, I would strongly recommend you DO NOT take the lump sum if you can manage without it. I turned down a £70k lump sum, but which would have almost halved my pension entitlement. Most final-salary schemes are index linked and of course that only applies to your pension. Any lump sum is a one-off and when its gone its gone! However the indexation (for me capped at 5%) is applied to my whole entitlement - 5% of the whole pension is a lot better than 5% of half a pension.

If you ask anyone who has taken the lump sum, I can pretty much guarantee they will tell you that they regret it.

old1baldy 03 Oct 2008, 8:27pm

I'm in a final salary pension scheme, however during the past year my company has been taken over by a french one. The scheme was closed to new starters a couple of years ago,and I know it has been struggling as our monthly contributions are now up to 8%.
Can this new owner change or stop the scheme and what are it's obligations to those of us still in the scheme?

9518 05 Oct 2008, 6:01pm

As a working person about to be granted his 'pension'.I find it difficult not to be sarcastic to someone who can afford to turn down a one off payment of £70k.
As a working person who has worked all his life (no it,s not a sob story just fact)pensions and annuities were things not fully understood.
What has been understood through experience is that where i have attempted to provide pension cover.
The money i have laid out has at best to my understanding been regarded as being available to the fat cats in the money market for their own use.
If i benefitted from any growth it has been after all and sundry have taken the commissions they worked very hard for.sick.
Fortunately i did see through the cashcow system and made an attempt to provide for myself and future family.
I did not pay fat commissions, but i do have a regular monthly income with capital growth and when i die my family has my asset to use, unlike the annuity system.

pdcovers 14 Oct 2008, 9:31am

Defined Benefit pension scheme membership started to go downhill in April 1975 as a result of a change in the Social Security Act 1973.
The change? Introduction of preservation for deferred pensions for people who left service prior to retirement.
The next change encouraging employers to opt out was in 1988 when indexation of deferred pensions was introduced.
The final step was introduced by the Pensions Act 1995 when that became law. For the first fime ever employers had to fund in advance for pensions promises.
Anybody today who does not opt to join a company pension scheme deserves to live in impoverished retirement.

Floopy21 15 Oct 2008, 1:48pm

And what does one do if their company doesn't offer a pension scheme?

MrTaurus 30 Oct 2008, 12:30pm

Floopy21 - lobby your company to establish a scheme; get your union, if you have one, on the case. Don't underestimate the power of organized labour. My company announced that the final salary sheme was to close to new entrants. The union balloted for strike action, not actually effected, and the company compromised and allowed new members to join after five years service. Downside is that contributions have steadily increased to the extent that some staff prefer to join the much cheaper, but inferior, defined contribution scheme.

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.